Womens and Mens issues
Women's reproductive issues
Systematically, I believe there is common ground between pro lifers and pro choicers. Instead of changing laws to commit a never ending tug of war between the two sides, we should focus on more policies that support women, children and families, which has already caused declining abortion numbers for years.
Systematically, I use to morally (as in moral victory) want Roe v Wade to be overturned with repartations for every woman forced to carry out an unwanted abortion. But now I systematically, want the government abolished and self government to replace it to deal with the abortion issue
I
Legality wise, I
Personally I am between pro life and begrudingly pro choice (with the view that abortion should be rare safe legal) on second trimester abortion
Legality wise, I am between pragmatically pro life (except when I temporarily oscillate to my lean pro choice/PLIABAN state, in which case, I am half heartingly pro choice) and begrudingly pro choice (with the view that abortion should be rare safe legal) on second trimester abortion
Personally I am pro life on third trimester abortion
Legality wise, I am between being pro life (even when I temporarily oscillate to my lean pro choice/PLIABAN state) and apolitical lean pro life on third trimester abortion
Personally and legality wise ,I am pro choice for abortion in the first 2 trimesters for rape, incest or to save the life of the mother. However, I believe that women who are pregnant via rape or incest should have very easy access to Misoprostol, ideally for the first 12 weeks of their pregnancies
Personally, I am Pro Life for third trimester abortion for rape, incest or to save the life of the mother. However, in those situations, I'd want abortion stations (that meet the standards of modern abortion clinics) with abortion workers to give women who want abortions due to rape or incest abortions if they try to have them illegally (like injection stations for drug addicts in Vancouver but for women who are pregnant via rape or incest who want abortions for that reason). I'd also be fine with abortion sanctuaries being opened up ONLY for women who want abortions for rape or incest
Legality wise I am Pro Life (except when I temporarily oscillate to my lean pro choice/PLIABAN state in which case I am Pro Choice) on third trimester abortion for rape ,incest and to save the life of the mother
The only reason I am not flat out pro life personally and legality wise is because I know that many to most women who have abortions end up having children anyway after their abortion, and many of those women who have children after their abortion, end up having more children than they would have if they didn't have their abortion
My mom almost lost me during her pregnancy and that forced me to be the way I am political wise on this issue. There is nothing wrong with being Pro Life and people who attack Pro Lifers are misguided at best and evil at worst. I believe life begins at conception.
However, legality wise if a baby who is conceived via rape or incest survives an abortion, I'd want that baby to get full medical care like any baby would and if they were denied medical care
I am against partial birth abortion and live birth abortion being legal even for babies conceived via rape and incest and I hope they are forever illegal
I believe women should not be discouraged from going to Pro life centers or going through with their pregnancies
I want a lot more adoption centers to be open nationwide
I am between Triangulation lean mixed and support on parental consent laws
I support parental notification laws
I am between pragmatically lean support and support for the Hyde Amendment.
I am between apolitical to militantly moderate (with positive emotions and an eye for womens health) on Texas's pro life laws (while being sympathetic to people who are against those laws). I am between somewhat against and against people criticizing Texas's pro life laws.
I am against Justin Trudeau going after pro life charities and pro life groups. Trudeau is a fascist dictator for doing that and proves he is a hypocrite on abortion since he doesn't trust women to make their own decision.
I am between pro life and conditionally pro life on whether women should be allowed to abort babies with Down Syndrome (for that reason)
I believe that kids should learn sex education before graduating elementary school and continue to learn it as preteens and teens. This would help kids, preteens and teens know not to become pregnant, to use common sense and have more anticonceptive access which should be easier for them to get. (with the methods approved by people with Christian values or Christian like values)
In addition, along with sex education, I'd also want kids, preteens and teens to to be taught abstinence (I am Pro Abstinence)
Ronald Reagan once said "the only people who are pro choice are people who are alive. I believe that it is a decent and definsible position
I believe that women should have easier access to Misoprostol for up to the first 12 weeks of pregnancy as a last ditch effort to curb clinic abortions
I have never and will never encourage women to have abortions. It's good to pray for women to keep their babies
I am between pro life and me being between neutral and lean conditionally support on whether I believe that health care providers should be required to offer free birth control
Personally, I am between indifferent and triangulation on birth control
Legality wise I am between indifferent and support (but rare safe legal) for birth control being legal
If men could have babies ,all of my abortion views would be exactly the same
I am radically apolitical to support (but rare safe legal) on Stem Cell research
I am against population control. Population Control is an assault on reproductive rights and its a human rights violation (right to procreate, right to life) . Human life is sacred. Overpopulation (the other excuse for it) is a myth. Climate change is real but population control doesn't stop it and is extremely counterproductive. The government has no right to have any say in a womans sex life. How many kids a woman has or whether she has kids is her decision to make not the Governments decision. China was and is wrong for using population control
feminism
I am between I support feminism to an extent and I support feminism. But there are a few feminist things that I am against (like that Lego complaint years ago by feminists, or the view by feminists that all men are rapists, or feminists saying that that video game designer from Puerto Rico was misogynist or should be fired for his gamer gate comments or feminists downplaying the evil extremism of Valerie Solanas, or the criticism of Jurassic World by some feminists, feminists complaining about urinals fringe things like that I disagree with feminists on)
I am a fan of 1980s Republican yuppie feminism (like the Republican yuppie feminism on the first season of Married with Children)
I respect the choice of women who engage in this type of feminism . #freedomofchoice
I proactively support females and mainstreaming of women into all spheres of life, even head of state.
Women should always get paid equally to men. I support income equality
I support women's suffrage
Margaret Thratcher was right about wanting something done get a woman to do it.
I am against specific aspects of the Equal Rights Amendment that need clarity. I don't really believe that much or at all that should be an equal amount of men and women players in the NFL, NBA, MLB, NHL, . I don't really believe that Women's Shelters should be shut down or be shelters for all genders or similar things in the ERA.
I am against Prostitution being legalized or decriminalized. Prostitution cheapens love and it is LUST. It also creates a negative environment for children who have a mother who does that. The buyer should only be arrested for prostitution not the sex worker. 1991 Oregon study of prostitution show alarming statistics for why sex work is a serious issue.
That Slate columnist did nothing wrong by sharing tips about Wikipedia controversies with another reporter or by mentioning the relationship status of Anita S.
I do not agree with things in the Wikipedia article about Gender Bias on Wikipedia. In my opinion, no one is stopping women from becoming Wikipedia editors and writing articles about women or other subjects. It is just as easy for women to jump in and become regular Wikipedia editors as it is for men to do so.
I believe gender equality needs to improve in politics too. Unequal representation of women in politics is the cause of our democratic deficit. Gender equality must be a principal which guides political action which is why I endorse mechanisms which allow women and men to apply to internal political leadership positions and in popular election positions. Not only do I endorse more women in the representation of the political parties but also in forums, seminars, training schools, and similar instances which give concrete signals based on equality and non discrimination
Men's issues
I am between having no issues with and being supportive of Josh Hawley's Men and the Future of America speech
Chris Pratt's Instagram post about his wife was not sexist in any way shape or form. Anyone who thinks otherwise has mental issues
I don't believe that male privilege is real. I have never and I will never apologize for being male. There is nothing wrong with being male.
I believe there is nothing wrong with men showing chivalry to women and I know that chivalry is not sexist
I am between being conditionally fine with Masculinity in at least some cases (if not most cases) and me beleiving that in general there is nothing wrong with Masculinity.
As long as Toxic Masculinity isn’t sexist or misogynist, I am not that against it otherwise I am fully against it
I like the hype masculinity of shows like Last Man Standing.
Male Chauvinism is too ridicoulous for me to take seriously. It's almost like Male Chauvinists are feminist plants or are Male Chauvinists are playing a character to get a rise out of feminists (so I don't get misquoted Male Chavunism is obviously wrong). I am glad that women don't need men anymore for babies. Also I am glad that women becoming Lesbians is more common now since they don't have to be stuck being married or in relationships with men who might be Male Chauvinists.
Mens/Womens relational issues
I believe that adopting children should be easier for people including and possibly especially Christians
I am supportive of the Promise Keepers and I don't feel they are a bad group. I'll leave it at that.
I believe that a husband has a responsibility to lead his household in a loving and gentle way, giving his life to his wife (like how Christ gave his life to the Church by dying) so she (the wife) can willingly submit to her husband's leadership.
I echo this view: A Promise Keeper is committed to building strong marriages and families through love, protection, and biblical values
There is nothing wrong with Sandy from Grease changing herself into a biker chic to please Danny, just like there is nothing wrong with Danny trying to be an athlete to please Sandy. Anyone who says otherwise is a fool. There is generally and conditionally nothing wrong with girls changing something about themselves in order to please a guy ,just like there is generally and conditionally nothing wrong with guys changing something about themselves in order to please a girl.
I am 100 percent against Domestic violence and domestic abusers should go to prison (but I don't believe that marriages should end over them automatically unless one side wants the marriages to end and I believe that husbands and wives should try to help each other while the other is in prison get through it if they decide to stay together)
However if a woman attacks her husband and is really physically hurting her husband, the husband should be allowed to defend themselves against the attacking wife if he can't prevent her from attacking him, even if he has to use violence against her to get her off of him/to stop attacking him/get her out of the way. Self defense is a human right. I believe women should beat the **** out of their husbands if their husbands abuse/hurt them or even try to abuse/hurt them. The best way for women to stop domestic violence and abuse is to literally fight back and kick the **** out of their husbands to teach them not to **** with them.
Similar to the Apostle Paul, I believe that for singles it is good for them to remain single unless they cannot self control in which case they should get into a romantic relationship (its better to get into a romantic relationship than to burn with lust) I believe this because single people have more time and freedom to help make our world more progressive, and due to me believing that romantic relationships are more a forced social construct, even more so than marriages and I hate forced social constructs.
In light of that, I would be somewhat open to the government creating a romantic relationship tax which taxes Americans (of all sexual orientations) who are in a romantic relationship. However, once they get married or they became single again, that tax would be eliminated unless they get into another romantic relationship again. Unlike Paul, I believe that marriages give people a lot more freedom today to make the world a better place than it was during Paul's time, almost as much freedom as singles in Paul's day had for themselves. If this tax had the negative side effect of causing less births (which I don't want since I am against Population control), then I would be against this tax unless I found some way to have this tax be legal while at the same time not causing less births.
Comments
Post a Comment