LGBTQ+ issues

 LGBTQ+

Personally, I am in between being begrudingly against gay marriage and me being in between apolitical and mixed on gay marriage

Systematically, I oscillate between being in between indifferent and live and let live on gay marriage and oscillating to me being lean moral (as in moral victory) support for gay marriage being legal but only if gay marriage is called gay marriage or same sex marriage and straight/heterosexual marriage is called marriage (to show they are different This is only because straight/heterosexual marriage has been around for 6000 years and got a head start. Maybe in a few centuries we can call all marriages, whether gay/same sex or straight/heterosexual 'marriage' but not until) otherwise I want Civil Marriage, Religious Marriage and Common Law  marriages to be abolished and this nationalized form of privatized marriage to be legalized and become the only form of legal marriage for both straight couples and gay couples :

Legality wise I am just for marriage in general (including gay marriage) and people (of all sexual orientations, i.e straight couples and gay couples) making that lifelong commitment to each other. I'm not against gay marriage (legality wise only) and I am relatively conservative.  Dear, G-d , please forgive me for this view, my motive for this is : 1 Corinthians 9:22

If nearly all to all gays aren't born gay and become gay by choice, then legality wise I would only support traditional marriage (instead of legality wise supporting gay marriage as I do now)

But in that hypothetical world where gays aren’t born gay and became gay by choice,  I wouldn’t fight against gay marriage because it is time to move on and I would be ok with people having a different view pro gay marriage) on that issue. 

Moreover in that hypothetical world where gays aren’t born gay and become gay by choice,  I would legality wise force myself to support something between Civil Unions and Ancient Rome type of gay marriage being legal for gay couples because I am an Anarcho Libertarian and Anarcho Libertarians are all about small government and keeping the government out of peoples lives

I want regular privatized not the nationalized form above, at some point in the future, ideally sooner rather than later, become the only legal form of marriage for both straight couples and gay couples (this means I want the US to abolish Civil Marriage, Religious Marriage and Common Law Marriage and legalize Privatized Marriage for both straight and gay couples regardless if gays are born gay or become gay by choice).  If that ever becomes the case, I would support gay marriage being legal (regardless if gays are born gay or become gay by choice). The government should stay out of the marriage business.

I always pray for God to at least try to make gays straight (if its God's will to do so) since I believe they are happier straight than gay.

Personally, I oscillate between being between supporting individual persons, whether heterosexual/homosexual/lesbian who are cohabiting/single to be able to adopt children. Ideally, in conjunction with a country wide layout of It Takes a Village type systems for children of parents of all sexual orientations, as mentioned here and by Hillary Clinton and apolitical to lean pragmatically Christian democratic on gay adoption (right) and me being between ambiguous and Third Way on gay adoption

Legality wise , I am neutral lean this politician’s view on this issue whether I believe that same sex couples should have parental presumption in terms of adoption.

Legality wise I am neutral on whether there should be laws which fight discrimination against gay couples or gay parents in gay adoption

Legality wise I am between tolerate and support for second parent adoption for gays

Personally and legality wise, I support gay people being able to be legal guardians of children.

I am between passively against gay conversion threapy being legal to me supporting gay conversion therapy being legal

I have no issues with people being against gay marriage or not supporting people being gay (as long as they don't hate gay people) 

I believe that Rick Perry's early 2010s anti gay laws are wrong. I can't think of any amendment which could make those anti gay laws more liberal and less anti gay.

I respect the 2015 Supreme court gay marriage decision since a gay person himself (Obergfell), legalized gay marriage via his court case as opposed to it being done via cancel culture, negative petitions where most signers are non gay, gay saviorism etc.

I am against gay criminalization laws. We live in a 21st century world, not biblical Israel.

In 1994, I supported S.AMDT.2434

In the 1990s until the mid 2000s, I was Radically Centrist on Don’t Ask Don’t Tell til I was syncretically dealigned on it

When I was a Democrat Liberal in the 2000s decade, I scored an 88 by the HRC

In 2003 after Massachusetts gay marriage ruling, I was opposed to gay marriage but supported leaving the decisions to the states

If there were 5 or more biological sexes of people on Earth instead of just 2 biological sexes, in that hypothetical world I would strongly encourage gays to be at least bisexual since there would be at least 4 opposite biological sexes of people to choose from for them to be in a romantic relationship with. In that world, I would privately say being gay is wrong and publically say that being gay is not ideal 

In the subconsciousness of my deep down insideness (not in my regular subconscious), I somewhat strongly feel that gays are more happier,  emotionally healthier and freeer straight than gay and that ideally they should at least be sympathetically nudged in that direction.

I morally (morally as in moral victory) support my former Christian church's ministry that helps gays. This is their mission statement:

My former Christian church's ministry compassionately walks side by side with any person whose life has been effected by same sex attraction and homosexuality. My former church's group has its members share their stories of their victories over sexual sin. This group uses biblical based wisdom and truth to show God's marriage and sexuality plan. They promote freedom that happens when people surrender their lives to Christ. They bridge the gay community and church, while offering hope rather than condemnation.   To disengage from the cultural wars over gay rights to instead focus on reaching people in the gay community one person at a time.  

I am against Lesbian Erasure. It is wrong for people to try to get Lesbians to transition to males or to become fluid and they should not be encouraged to do so. It's only fair that Lesbians get more visibility  within the LGBTQ movement (ie as much visibility as Homosexuals). If you support gay rights you have to also support women being Lesbians and being equal to Homosexuals

I am against Heterophobia. There is nothing oppressive or wrong about Heterosexuality. 

I am between radically centrist and supportive on the Straight Pride Movement

I support in the same exact way that Elizabeth Warren supports LGBTQ marriage and rights but in a dealigned way, the Gay shame movement and destroying our heterosexist hierarchal society (including marriage ie the abolishment of state sanctioned coupling for people of all sexual orientations ie straight and gay) to form a post sexual orientation world where people would literally be sexual orientation blind). But if this becomes a mainstream view or even a mainstream Democrat view, I will force myself to be alt Radically Center right on the Gay shame movement and Heterosexism

I have no real issues with the view that kids should not learn about LGBTQ+ things in school (to put it midly). At best, kids should wait to learn LGBTQ things until they are late into their teens and are curious, and thus mature enough to learn about it (since kids don't have mature brains until later). Teaching kids about LGBTQ things is indoctinaration. Let kids be kids

I am against kids in preschool and k-4 school being taught these type of things. I plead the fifth on whether I believe kids in 5-12 should be taught those type of things. That type of teaching has no place in preschool and elementary schools

I am between being fine with to triangulation on Cissexism

I support and am a member of the Super straight movement

I feel we shouldn't debate about transgender rights because that is a distraction from our real problems. Who cares what transgender people do, let's focus on real issues

Nowhere in the bible does it say that being transgender is a sin.  No person or civilization from the B.C era through the Middle Ages through the Victorian era ever had any issues with people being Transgender . 

I believe all men should be able to play women's sports and women should be able to play men's sports, that way it doesn't matter if a transgender person is playing a man or women's sport. 

I believe bathrooms should be unisex, and include urinals and toilets. I also believe that those unisex bathrooms should be a fusion of men's and women's bathrooms. This way the whole trans bathroom debate is settled

I believe that transgender people are the gender God sees them as. 

I believe there are biological differences between males and females

I personally and legality wise lean support for transgender marriage

Males have penises , females have breasts and vaginas. SCIENCE SAYS SO. Anyone who says otherwise is a nuts. Science says so 

Children networks should not be teaching kids about Draq Queens. Children should not be drag queens and children should not be exposed to drag queens. Shame on Nickelodeon for their indoctrination of our kids with that highly questionable material.

There is NOTHING wrong or transphobic about a woman saying they are proud to be a woman. I fully support Adele's 2022 Brit Awards speech. Her speech was 100 percent positive and great.

Personally I don't believe children under 16 should be transgender. Legality wise I am vote present while noting off the record that I am against children under 16 becoming transgender

Teachers shouldn't encourage students to be transgender. Their job is to teach not to convert kids into being transgender. I am also against Nickelodeon teaching kids about I am also against Nickelodeon teaching kids about trangenderism

I can name as many genders as the most Conservative students at Cal Berkeley can

I am between neutral and lean agree and agree on the viewpoint that transgender women should not be allowed to get cervical cancer screenings since they don't have those organs and that transgender men should be allowed to get cervical and breast cancer screenings.

I support RuPaul not allowing women who had sex change surgeries to compete in the drag race since they have unfair advantages over the drag queens. I also agree with a few of RuPual's anti trans views that he had years back

I am against there being a Transgender Rememberance Day

I am apolitical lean with a heavy heart against hate crime laws for hate crimes committed against gay, transgender and transsexual people. There is enough hate crime laws (ie biological sex, race-ethnicity, religion etc)  to cover most of the hate crimes against gay, transgender and transsexual people without having to add more. 

Furthermore, I am a Anarcho Libertarian (small government), and adding yet more hate crime laws after all of the current hate crime laws has put me over the edge where I am apolitical lean with a heavy heart against hate crime laws for hate crimes committed against gay, transgender or transsexual people.